Lesnik-Oberstein, Karin. "Childhood and Textuality: Culture,
History, Literature." Children in Culture: Approaches to Childhood.
Ed. Lesnik-Oberstein, Karin. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.
Keep in mind that this reading is the introductory chapter to the text
Children in Culture: Approaches to Childhood. The author will
reference other chapters and it is interesting to note her summarizes
of what the various chapters discuss. This gives you an overview of
the text without having to completely read it. But, Lesnik-Oberstein
also makes her own argument in this introductory chapter. [Note: This
article will probably be more difficult to read than the previous two,
but keep reading.]
-Lesnik-Oberstein begins her article with two questions: "how
does our society see and position childhood and the child? What factors
are deemed to be of relevance to these discussions, and what kind of
language can be used?" (1). Keep these broad questions in mind
not only through this reading but throughout the class.
-What is the constructivist view on childhood? How does it differ from
the essentialist view? (This question is addressed early in the chapter,
but finish the chapter and then return to this question.)
-Is childhood the area of one discipline? What are some different ways
to approach childhood? (Let the examples and chapter discussions open
you up to possibilities for your group project.)
-What are some central questions regarding childhood, identity, and
society?
-What is the central argument that Lesnik-Oberstein examines in the
chapter? (Again, this question is addressed early in the chapter, but
finish reading the chapter and then return to it.)
-How does this article's discussion of medieval childhood differ from
Kline? What does this difference mean to us as scholars? How can the
reading of these two articles impact the way you as a student researches
and discusses material for this class?
-Childhood defines and is defined by what? Explain.
-What does Lesnik-Oberstein argue in regards to the academic discipline
of children's literature?
-What is the author talking about when she refers to the "'real'
child"? How does this relate to children's literature? How could
this be problematic?
-Return to the question of Lesnik-Oberstein's central argument. What
essentially does she try to demonstrate? Explain in your own words.